Nikola Tesla Books
in movement in the excited system would be 2 x 129,500 x !$ {{P^{2} \times 75.2} \over {2 \times 9 \times 10^{11}}} !$ watts.
If we assume that, as before, 1% of the total energy of the system is frittered down in the lamp we would have, in conformity with what was stated before for determining P, the equation
!$ {2 \times 129,500 \times {{P^{2} \times 75.2} \over {2 \times 9 \times 10^{11}}}} !$ = 1000 or P2 = !$ {{18 \times 10^{11}} \over 259} !$
or
P = !$ {10^{5} \sqrt{180 \over 259}} !$ = !$ {10^{5} \sqrt{0.695}} !$ = !$ {10^{5} \times 0.834} !$
or 83,400 V nearly, which is a small e.m.f. The length of wire in excited circuit was as before stated 2198 feet; the wire being No. 10, with a resistance of 1 ohm per one thousand feet, the resistance of the circuit was about 2.2 ohm. From above p = 2!$ \pi !$n was = 6.28 x 129,500 = 813,260 or, say, 813,000 = p. The inductance being, as shown, !$ {185 \over 10^{4}} !$ henry, the magnifying factor in the coil was !$ {{{185 \over 10^{4}} \times 813 \times 10^{3}} \over 2.2} !$ = 6840 nearly. The lamp was one with a very short filament and its resistance may have been possibly 6 ohms. Thus with the lamp comprised the magnifying factor was still very considerable, that is, !$ {{185 \times 813} \over 82} !$ = 1830 or nearly so. Taking it at 1800 we see that it was necessary, under the conditions assumed, to impress upon the ground plate, or near portions of the ground an electromotive force of only !$ {83,400 \over 1800} !$ = !$ {834 \over 18} !$ = 52 volts or nearly so! This seems very little indeed, it can be scarcely believed, but the figures seem to be not far from truth. These remarks refer particularly to the experiment illustrated on the plate marked XXIV. in which the connections were the same as in the diagram shown when discussing Plate XXII., the lamp or lamps being in series with the excited coil or system.
The explanation to Photograph XXII concerning the transmission of power from the excited primary circuit to the "extra coil" via the earth is similar to that he gave in 1893(6). The experiment to which the photograph refers was made with the aim of estimating the power of the oscillator from the thermal effect of the HF current. What Tesla calls the "total energy set in movement" would correspond to the total energy transferred to condenser in the secondary (i.e. the power) if an energy of !${1 \over 2}!$ CV2 is transferred in each half-cycle. It can be shown that the active power dissipated in the circuit is much less than this and is inversely proportional to the Q-factor of the oscillating circuit.