Nikola Tesla Books
And now we have:
$! {{T_{p}''' \over T_{p}''} = {\sqrt{1.099}} = {\sqrt{{403.75 + c''} \over {403.75 + 78.75}}}} $! and from this
1.099 x (403.75 + 78.75) - 403.75 = c'' = 126.51 cm.
The value at one foot lower was, as before found 78.75 cm, therefore by lifting the sphere from 34,66 to 35.66 feet, the capacity was further increased by 126.51 - 78.75 = 47.76 cm, or about 125%. The value which would correspond to the mean would therefore be about 116% per foot. The method followed contains still some possible errors. One of them lies in the assumption that the capacity of the sphere was 38.1 cm at the starting point. Also there may be an error in the estimation of self-induction of the turns of the regulating coil.
Colorado Springs
Oct. 10, 1899
Resistances measured:
Large extra coil 149 t. wire No. 10 drum 75â |
With cord | 3.7 ohms |
---|---|---|
cord | 0.596 ohms | |
Coil alone | 3.104 ohms |
Coil used in series with extra coil. When ball was not used on top of latter:
160 t. No. 10 wire drum 2 feet |
with cord | 1.65 |
---|---|---|
cord | 0.596 | |
Coil alone | 1.054 ohms |
Resistance of coil used in determining influence of elevation on capacity:
400 turns No. 20 cord drum 25.25" |
with cord | 31.20 |
---|---|---|
cord | 0.596 | |
Coil alone | 30.604 ohms |
Resistance of secondary latest:
with cord | 3.36 ohms |
cord | 0.596 ohms |
Secondary alone | 2.764 ohms |
218
October 9
He continues to improve the method for variable capacitance measurement of a sphere by varying the height. Last measurements he performed on Oct. 5, but he did not provide the calculated values.
After that he was improving the apparatus as a whole, and changed the "special coil" connection method. "Weaker Link", which was a main characteristic of the change, indicated immediately its good characteristics. Less excited "special coil" was easier to be adjusted in resonance, because there were no current streamers. The effect of parasitic capacitance was reduced to mainly distributed capacitance of the "special coil". Prior to the sphere capacitance variation measurement related to height variation, he determines the "special coil" distributed capacitance. He assumes that the circuit with a sphere resonates at frequency Ï0, which is defined by oscillator primary circuit so that it could be written: Lp1Cp = Lsc(c + C), where Lp1 and Cp are total inductance (with the regulating coil included) and primary oscillator circuit capacitance, respectively. Lsc is ''special coil'' inductance (with inductances connections included). C is distributed or parasitic capacitance of the "special coil", and c is the sphere capacitance. At some other height only the sphere capacitance is changed in the circuit of the "special coil". In order to achieve the resonance between the system and the signal from the oscillator, Tesla varies the inductance in the primary circuit. When the generator frequency is equal to the resonant frequency of "free coil" circuit, according to Tesla, the following equation could be written: Lp2Cp = Lsc(c' + C).
Division of this equation by the previous one results in: c' = Lp2(c + C) - C, which corresponds to Tesla's equation from which c' is determined. Due to a calculation error when C was calculated, Tesla's various results for the sphere capacitance are higher by approximately 10%, but this does not essentially change the main conclusions. When calculating the coil distributed capacitance* he uses the relation LpCp = Lsc(c + C) for the sphere at a height, where he considers that its capacitance is close to the theoretical value for the remote sphere.
When commenting on results, he mentioned that this assumption could be the cause of the error.
* Under the term coil distributed capacitance Tesla considers the total capacitance among coil turns. Here he uses another definition "internal capacitance", which is similar to the one which is normally used even today.