Nikola Tesla Books
Now it is evident that when the relation between p1, Lp and Cp exists, which is here implied, the current passes through the system as if there would be no inductance, hence insofar as the circuit including the break, C1 and L1 is concerned the system LpCp will comport itself as if it consisted of a short wire of inappreciable resistance, the primary being generally made of stout short conductor - therefore, in estimating the quantities of the circuit C1L1b the compound system LpCp may be neglected since it will have little influence upon the period under the conditions assumed, and we may then put C1 = $! {1 \over {p^{2} L_{1}}} $! when resistances are, as always before, negligible.
Since C1 is known we can determine L1 because
L1 = $! {1 \over {p^{2} C_{1}}} $! = $! {1 \over {p^{2} {{8 \pi M} \over {P'^{2} p_{1}}}}} $! = $! {{P'^{2} p_{1}} \over {8 \pi M p^{2}}} $!
Presently then all the quantities are known for determining the constants of circuit LpCp from the two equations:
Lp Cp = Ls Cs
Lp Cp = L1 C1 . . . . . . . . . . III.
Colorado Springs
July 3, 1899
In experiments with the secondary as last described, fairly good resonance was obtained with 15 jars on each side of the primary. A length of wire No. 10 - 170 feet - was covered with intense streamers. The capacity - total - was 7.5x0.003=0.0225 mfd. Lp was approximately estimated 36x7x104 cm. (six primary turns in series). From this T = $! {4.836 \over 10^{5}} $! as calculated. This gives n = $! {1 \over T} $! = 20,7000 per sec. approx. With this vibration λ was nearly 9 miles or $! {λ \over 4} $! = 2.25 miles. Actually, there was only one mile of secondary wire but owing to the large capacity (distributed) in the secondary the vibration was much slower than should be inferred from the length of wire. We may estimate the ideal capacity, which associated with the inductance of the secondary would give a vibration of the above frequency. Since there was resonance we have:
T = $! {4.836 \over 10^{5}} $! = $! {{2 \pi \over 10^{3}} \sqrt{{5 \times 10^{7} \over 10^{9}} C_{s}}} $!
Taking the inductance of the secondary as being 5x107 cm. and from this
Cs = $! {23.34 \over 20,000} $! = roughly $! {1 \over 1000} $! mfd. more exactly 0.0012 mfd. or 1080 cm.
But we may approximately estimate capacity in another way taking the wires in pairs as a condenser. This would give Cs = $! {{A \over 4 \pi d} \times 40} $!, there being 40 pairs since there
59
July 2
Here Tesla gives the calculation of values for the spark gap oscillator in the fullest detail so far. However, the analysis does not include all the magnitudes relevant to the functioning of the oscillator, e.g. the primary/secondary coupling of the transformer and the distributed capacitance of the secondary. The power equation is also not fully explained and justified. However, by means of this approximate calculation Tesla did get a valuable rough guide relatively quickly and easily.
July 2
From that which has so far been given in segments, he finally formulates completely as a method as to how to perform the approximate calculation on the oscillator in Figure No. 1. For the purpose of clarity we will repeat Tesla's calculation method:
- the designed oscillator wavelength is chosen;
- on the basis of wavelength the secondary coil wire length is determined as one quarter of the wavelength;
- secondary inductance is determined on the basis of known wire length and chosen coil shape;
- for most efficient operation the capacitance at the open secondary terminal has to be such that Cs= 1/p2Ls, by neglecting the losses;
- the inductance and capacitance of oscillator primary circuit are determined on the basis that the condition of equal own primary and secondary frequencies is met: LpCp = LsCs. Normally Lp is much smaller than Ls so that the winding ratio of primary and secondary Np/Ns is much smaller than 1.
In procedure we have shown, there is no mention about mutual link between primary and secondary. Secondary distributed capacitance is neglected as well. With the oscillator shown in Figure No. 2, the arcing device is outside of primary circuit LpCp and this according to Tesla enables the achievement of less dampened oscillations in the primary circuit and less current through the arcing device. Under assumption that at the operation frequency circuit LpCp is in resonance, the current 'i' is considerably smaller than current i2. Capacitance C1 (which appears in Figures 3 and 4 as
well) is determined so that it can accumulate the entire energy which can be transmitted from the network via the supply transformer. At discharge of C1 accumulated energy is converted to energy of high frequency currents. Additional condition for C1 is given by equation II.
July 3
Secondary distributed capacitance is one of the Tesla oscillator elements which cannot be determined easily. This magnitude depends on coil diameter, wire size and its insulation and coil winding method. At one layer coils it originates mainly due to influence of adjacent windings and Tesla calculates it so. He ultimately simplifies the model and takes that parasitic capacitance per turn is equal A/4Ïd, where A=rÏl - ½ of one turn wire area, and 'd' is distance between turns. According to this model, capacitance is calculated as for a plate type capacitor of area A and distanced between plates with air insulation. There are a number of disadvantages of such a model, but it should not be forgotten that Tesla is looking for the solution. It is not correct also that he considers in the secondary circuit with "additional coil" all inductances and capacitances added together, but Tesla is aware that all this is just guessing and he frequently mentions words as "approximately", "estimate" and "similar".
Contrary to one previous calculation (please see June 20) when Tesla started with primary circuit and calculated the secondary, now he does the opposite; on the basis of secondary circuit resonant frequency and known primary inductance (one turn) he determines the primary circuit capacitance. After that he checks whether the found capacitance is allowed to be used with regards to the transformer power of low frequency. The applied equation is approximate, but it is good for orientational analysis of network transformer energy balance. Maximum transformer power has to be larger than the found one, because the capacitor in the primary is not charged all the time, and then only in short impulses.